This is more than UT (there are P & W and including Sikorsky among them) and pay EADS together. And that's more than any other defense companies squeeze together. Yes, this is a business model.
windy as the third edition of the story is reflected in the fact that both providers have moved virtually unchanged in the battle but won Boeing has won. Allegedly were lower "operating costs" the key. Soso. Was that before so in the criteria it? Otherwise I EADS is hardly the same with the unchanged taken up by the KC-330 before you even knew that it is in terms of performance and operating costs than the Boeing bird.
But that's not all that important. Boeing's "marketing" department has brought success. And what are already close to 18 million from $ a 35 billion dollar contract. Even Teddy DiBiase can the pay out of petty cash.
(Honestly, if this continues I'll have a private Boeing-day ...)
0 comments:
Post a Comment